2004-09 Aggregate Wins, Losses, etc…

by cgb on Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:00 am
It’s numbers time again. After the jump there’s a whole slew of aggregated statistics over the last six years (note that the left hand column ‘1-120′  is not a ranking system, but merely a row label) . Have fun. Here are a couple of observations, feel free to leave yours in the comments.
  • The SEC has four teams in the top fifteen.
  • Wisconsin might finally win the Big Ten, if they could play every game at home.
  • Hats off to Navy.
  • Boise State, West Virginia, Utah and TCU—cupcakes—Om Nom Nom Nom.
  • This is how the conference BCS bottom feeders stack up by winning percentage: ACC-Duke 119th, Pac-10-Washington 115th, Big-East Syracuse 110th, Big 12-Baylor 103rd, Big 10-Illinois 102nd, and SEC-Vanderbilt 99th. Hooray ACC.
  • W-L: Wins and Losses
  • (%): Winning Percentage
  • Wc-Lc: Conference Wins and Losses
  • Ww-Lw: Wins and Losses against teams with a winning record
  • W25-L25: Wins and Losses against Associated Press Top 25 teams from the final AP Poll of that year
  • M(W): Single season highest wins
  • M(L): Single season highest losses
  • H%: Home winning percentage
  • A%: Away winning percentage

Team W-L (%) Wc-Lc Ww-Lw W25-L25 M(W) M(L) H% A%
1. Boise State 69-9 (88.46%) 46-2 20-7 6-5 14 4 97.5% 84.85%
2. Texas 69-9 (88.46%) 43-7 32-8 15-5 13 3 91.89% 88.46%
3. USC 68-10 (87.18%) 43-9 28-8 20-7 13 4 91.67% 82.86%
4. Ohio State 62-14 (81.58%) 40-8 24-12 12-10 12 4 87.8% 78.57%
5. Florida 64-15 (81.01%) 38-13 29-14 15-13 13 5 92.5% 70.83%
6. West Virginia 59-17 (77.63%) 31-10 19-15 6-8 11 4 87.18% 67.74%
7. Utah 59-17 (77.63%) 35-12 16-11 6-8 13 5 86.11% 64.71%
8. Virginia Tech 62-18 (77.5%) 40-11 27-17 12-12 11 4 87.5% 78.57%
9. Oklahoma 62-18 (77.5%) 43-9 29-17 14-15 12 5 97.3% 68%
10. TCU 58-17 (77.33%) 36-12 13-13 5-8 12 6 88.57% 65.71%
11. LSU 60-18 (76.92%) 34-16 22-16 13-13 12 5 86.05% 68%
12. Georgia 58-19 (75.32%) 33-16 27-17 10-14 11 5 76.32% 80.77%
13. Wisconsin 57-20 (74.03%) 31-17 15-18 6-14 12 6 90% 56.67%
14. Penn State 55-20 (73.33%) 31-17 17-19 9-15 11 7 83.33% 57.14%
15. Auburn 55-21 (72.37%) 32-17 17-20 12-12 13 7 77.78% 60%
16. BYU 54-21 (72%) 38-9 12-16 3-11 11 6 77.78% 66.67%
17. Boston College 56-22 (71.79%) 30-18 24-16 8-8 11 5 84.62% 61.29%
18. Texas Tech 54-22 (71.05%) 31-17 15-18 7-13 11 5 86.84% 53.13%
19. Alabama 55-23 (70.51%) 32-18 14-20 9-15 14 7 81.4% 58.33%
20. Navy 53-24 (68.83%) 9-4 6-18 0-6 10 5 75.76% 66.67%
21. California 52-24 (68.42%) 32-20 15-18 8-15 10 6 83.78% 51.52%
22. Cincinnati 52-24 (68.42%) 28-15 15-17 6-13 12 7 82.86% 55.56%
23. Oregon 51-24 (68%) 35-17 15-18 10-15 10 6 78.95% 59.38%
24. Iowa 49-26 (65.33%) 29-19 16-20 10-11 11 7 79.49% 46.67%
25. Missouri 50-27 (64.94%) 27-23 17-21 4-12 12 6 72.97% 57.14%
26. Louisville 47-26 (64.38%) 24-19 15-23 4-11 12 8 78.38% 46.88%
27. Georgia Tech 50-28 (64.1%) 33-17 15-25 8-16 11 6 71.79% 64.52%
28. Oregon State 48-28 (63.16%) 33-19 15-23 5-20 10 6 69.44% 54.29%
29. Rutgers 47-28 (62.67%) 21-20 12-22 1-13 11 7 67.5% 53.33%
30. Central Michigan 48-29 (62.34%) 38-12 9-20 0-7 12 7 73.33% 53.85%
31. Hawaii 49-30 (62.03%) 31-17 10-23 0-13 12 7 75% 43.33%
32. Clemson 47-29 (61.84%) 28-21 14-26 4-15 9 6 75% 51.72%
33. Miami (Florida) 46-29 (61.33%) 25-23 16-24 8-13 9 7 71.05% 53.13%
34. Florida State 47-30 (61.04%) 28-21 19-27 8-15 9 6 65.79% 50%
35. Tennessee 46-30 (60.53%) 28-22 18-25 6-18 10 7 71.43% 50%
36. Nebraska 46-30 (60.53%) 26-24 13-28 2-18 10 7 71.43% 46.43%
37. Tulsa 47-31 (60.26%) 31-20 13-22 1-6 11 8 69.44% 50%
38. Michigan 44-30 (59.46%) 28-20 19-23 7-19 11 9 67.44% 51.85%
39. Troy 44-30 (59.46%) 33-9 5-21 0-7 9 7 86.67% 42.5%
40. Fresno State 45-31 (59.21%) 31-17 7-26 1-11 9 8 69.7% 52.63%
41. Pittsburgh 43-30 (58.9%) 23-18 12-22 5-12 10 7 69.23% 48.39%
42. South Florida 44-31 (58.67%) 20-23 12-26 5-14 9 7 68.57% 48.57%
43. Houston 45-32 (58.44%) 33-17 9-26 1-6 10 8 78.38% 42.86%
44. Kansas 42-31 (57.53%) 20-28 14-24 3-12 12 7 75% 29.63%
45. Oklahoma State 43-32 (57.33%) 23-25 10-30 3-17 9 7 69.23% 41.38%
46. Southern Mississippi 44-33 (57.14%) 30-19 8-22 0-7 9 6 67.65% 45.95%
47. Arizona State 42-32 (56.76%) 26-26 9-29 2-20 10 8 68.29% 41.38%
48. Connecticut 42-32 (56.76%) 17-24 6-28 2-13 9 8 71.79% 35.48%
49. Nevada 43-33 (56.58%) 31-17 6-19 0-8 9 7 75% 41.67%
50. Notre Dame 41-33 (55.41%) 5-2 11-29 4-15 10 9 56.41% 51.85%
51. Wake Forest 41-33 (55.41%) 23-26 15-25 6-13 11 7 63.16% 43.75%
52. South Carolina 41-33 (55.41%) 22-26 12-31 3-20 8 6 63.41% 48.28%
53. Bowling Green 40-33 (54.79%) 30-18 4-23 0-8 9 8 56.67% 56.41%
54. Arkansas 40-34 (54.05%) 21-28 8-32 3-23 10 7 65.79% 37.04%
55. Northwestern 40-34 (54.05%) 25-23 9-26 5-17 9 8 64.1% 45.16%
56. UCLA 40-35 (53.33%) 26-26 13-27 7-17 10 8 68.42% 37.5%
57. East Carolina 40-36 (52.63%) 32-18 8-26 2-7 9 9 67.65% 41.67%
58. Air Force 38-35 (52.05%) 25-22 6-26 0-15 9 8 58.33% 45.45%
59. Texas A&M 38-36 (51.35%) 22-26 12-29 3-20 9 8 65% 39.29%
60. Virginia 37-36 (50.68%) 23-25 15-28 2-16 9 9 63.16% 37.5%
61. Northern Illinois 38-37 (50.67%) 29-19 8-26 0-5 9 10 66.67% 41.67%
62. Middle Tennessee 36-36 (50%) 27-17 4-22 0-4 10 7 63.33% 41.03%
63. Purdue 37-37 (50%) 21-27 5-32 2-19 8 8 60% 38.71%
64. Toledo 36-37 (49.32%) 25-24 7-22 0-3 9 9 64.71% 34.29%
65. Michigan State 36-38 (48.65%) 20-28 12-27 3-20 9 8 60% 38.71%
66. Ohio 36-38 (48.65%) 26-24 3-26 0-6 9 8 59.38% 44.74%
67. Florida Atlantic 35-37 (48.61%) 21-15 6-23 0-5 8 9 51.85% 42.86%
68. Western Michigan 35-37 (48.61%) 24-23 4-23 0-4 9 10 64.52% 35.14%
69. Maryland 35-38 (47.95%) 19-29 17-30 2-16 9 10 57.89% 32.26%
70. Kentucky 35-39 (47.3%) 15-33 8-30 2-20 8 9 53.66% 32.14%
71. UTEP 34-38 (47.22%) 23-25 7-22 1-5 8 8 61.11% 35.29%
72. North Carolina 34-39 (46.58%) 22-26 12-31 5-19 8 9 61.54% 32.26%
73. Wyoming 33-39 (45.83%) 17-30 3-25 0-14 7 8 58.33% 29.41%
74. Arizona 33-39 (45.83%) 23-29 8-28 9-20 8 8 53.85% 35.48%
75. Minnesota 34-41 (45.33%) 16-32 4-35 0-21 7 11 56.41% 35.48%
76. UCF 34-41 (45.33%) 27-23 6-30 0-5 10 11 54.05% 40%
77. New Mexico 33-40 (45.21%) 21-26 7-24 1-12 9 11 50% 42.86%
78. Louisiana Tech 33-40 (45.21%) 24-24 3-32 1-11 8 10 70.97% 24.39%
79. Kansas State 32-39 (45.07%) 17-31 5-30 2-15 7 7 65% 17.24%
80. Colorado 28-35 (44.44%) 17-25 10-28 3-16 8 10 61.29% 26.09%
81. Mississippi 32-40 (44.44%) 15-33 6-30 4-18 9 9 55% 26.67%
82. Louisiana-Lafayette 31-39 (44.29%) 22-21 1-20 0-5 6 9 54.55% 35.14%
83. Ball State 32-41 (43.84%) 26-22 7-29 0-6 12 10 43.75% 47.37%
84. Memphis 32-42 (43.24%) 22-26 6-26 0-3 8 10 50% 37.5%
85. North Carolina State 31-41 (43.06%) 17-31 12-31 4-11 7 9 50% 29.63%
86. Louisiana-Monroe 30-40 (42.86%) 23-19 4-19 0-6 6 8 58.62% 33.33%
87. Arkansas State 30-41 (42.25%) 22-21 5-20 0-7 6 8 73.33% 20.51%
88. Akron 30-42 (41.67%) 23-26 3-26 0-6 7 9 53.33% 30.77%
89. Iowa State 30-43 (41.1%) 14-34 5-27 1-15 7 10 57.89% 19.35%
90. Marshall 29-43 (40.28%) 23-25 4-35 0-11 7 9 61.76% 19.44%
91. San Jose State 27-44 (38.03%) 17-31 0-27 0-9 9 10 58.82% 16.67%
92. Stanford 27-44 (38.03%) 20-32 6-32 3-20 8 11 43.24% 33.33%
93. Colorado State 27-45 (37.5%) 15-32 6-31 0-12 7 9 50% 23.53%
94. Mississippi State 26-45 (36.62%) 13-35 6-33 1-22 8 9 41.03% 29.03%
95. UAB 26-45 (36.62%) 18-30 6-30 0-3 7 10 51.61% 25.64%
96. Indiana 26-45 (36.62%) 10-38 6-30 0-16 7 9 48.72% 22.58%
97. Rice 26-46 (36.11%) 21-27 7-30 0-10 10 10 50% 24.32%
98. Miami (Ohio) 26-47 (35.62%) 21-28 5-27 0-6 8 11 45.16% 31.58%
99. Vanderbilt 25-46 (35.21%) 11-37 6-34 2-20 7 10 36.84% 31.25%
100. Kent State 24-46 (34.29%) 17-31 1-21 0-3 6 10 41.94% 28.95%
101. SMU 24-47 (33.8%) 17-31 3-28 1-7 8 11 51.43% 14.29%
102. Illinois 24-47 (33.8%) 13-35 7-33 3-20 9 10 44.74% 25%
103. Baylor 23-47 (32.86%) 9-39 4-39 0-22 5 9 42.11% 22.58%
104. Washington State 23-48 (32.39%) 12-40 5-32 1-22 6 11 34.38% 30.3%
105. Buffalo 23-49 (31.94%) 18-31 1-30 0-6 8 10 40.63% 23.68%
106. San Diego State 22-49 (30.99%) 15-32 1-33 0-17 5 10 45.71% 16.67%
107. Temple 21-50 (29.58%) 16-16 0-37 0-10 9 11 42.42% 18.92%
108. Tulane 20-50 (28.57%) 11-37 3-32 1-7 5 10 38.89% 17.65%
109. Army 20-50 (28.57%) 2-12 3-33 0-7 5 9 39.39% 24.14%
110. Syracuse 20-51 (28.17%) 8-33 5-37 2-20 6 10 39.47% 15.63%
111. Idaho 20-52 (27.78%) 12-35 0-26 0-7 8 11 38.71% 17.5%
112. New Mexico State 19-54 (26.03%) 8-37 3-30 0-8 5 12 37.84% 13.89%
113. UNLV 18-52 (25.71%) 9-38 1-33 0-16 5 10 38.89% 11.76%
114. North Texas 17-54 (23.94%) 13-30 0-26 0-5 7 11 29.03% 20.51%
115. Washington 17-54 (23.94%) 10-42 4-35 1-27 5 12 30.77% 16.13%
116. Florida International† 14-45 (23.73%) 10-26 0-22 0-5 5 12 40% 12.12%
117. Utah State 16-54 (22.86%) 13-34 0-34 0-14 4 11 36.67% 12.5%
118. Eastern Michigan 16-54 (22.86%) 13-34 4-27 0-3 4 12 29.63% 17.95%
119. Duke 13-57 (18.57%) 5-43 3-40 0-18 5 12 22.22% 14.71%
120. Western Kentucky‡ 2-22 (8.33%) 0-8 0-11 0-2 2 12 9.09% 7.69%

† Florida International has competed in NCAA I-A from 2005-09
‡ Western Kentucky has competed in NCAA I-A from 2008-09

All of the statistics are compiled and cross referenced by me from cfbstats.com and the NCAA.

Leave your thoughts in the comments…

Read more: Greatest Hits, Statistics
Rep: BallHype: hype it up! Share ('DiggThis’)

7 Responses to “2004-09 Aggregate Wins, Losses, etc…”

Track Responses to This Entry With the RSS Feed Send a Trackback Write a Response

  1. 1AParker on Jan 11, 2010 at 12:21 pm:

    Good post, must not have been fun putting all this together though

  2. 2younglefty on Jan 12, 2010 at 3:57 pm:

    My thought is that good gracious that’s a lot of numbers.

  3. 3Box on Jan 24, 2010 at 9:29 am:

    No sortable columns? Cmon, internet mogul.

    Props to OU for that home winning %. Good stuff.

  4. 4cgb on Jan 25, 2010 at 1:11 am:

    NUMBERS NOM NOM NOM

    @Box Use mental sorting, it’s much more rewarding.

  5. 5In The Bleachers on Jan 30, 2010 at 10:36 am:

    Just got to this on my reader, love that shit son. Nothing like my Heels sitting at 34-39 after going 16-10 the last two season. Butch will swing us up. Next year in Chapel Hill baby, we’ll sweep the leg.

  6. 6jEREMY on Mar 11, 2010 at 12:49 pm:

    fuck you turkey sucking faggots…

  7. 7vtbaz on Mar 11, 2010 at 6:59 pm:

    hey jeremy, your caps lock was on.

Leave a Reply

Want a fancy avatar to go along with your comment? Gravatar.

Name Email Website URI